Health economics and Gini index

Health economics and Gini index

Required Resources
Read/review the following resources for this activity:

  • Textbook: Chapters 5, 6, 7, 8
  • Lesson: Week 3, 4

ORDER A CUSTOM-WRITTEN,  PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW

Instructions

Choose one question from each of the question sets below (2 sets total). In other words, you will be answering two questions total (1 from each set).

Question Set 1

  • Explain the difference between income inequality and wealth inequality in the United States. Explain the racial wealth gap.
  • What is social stratification? Examine four common ways or systems in which groups have become stratified. How does race or ethnicity play a role in the stratification?
  • Briefly compare and contrast a Weberian approach and a Marxian approach to characterize the social classes in the United States. In a Weberian approach, what are social classes based on or how are they understood? In a Marxian approach, how is class understood? In a Weberian approach, how is the racial wealth gap understood? In a Marxian approach, how is the racial wealth gap understood? Health economics and Gini index.

 

Question Set 2

  • Explain some characteristics of the U.S. poor based on age, gender, and race or ethnicity. Predicts people’s relative chances of being poor based on age, gender, or race, for example.
  • Explain the Gini index and its relationship to global inequality. Compare the Gini coefficient for the United States with that of other nations. Health economics and Gini index.
  • What is global stratification? Examine global stratification’s relationship to economic inequality.

 

Writing Requirements (APA format)

  • Length: 1-2 pages (not including References page)
  • 1-inch margins
  • Double spaced
  • 12-point Times New Roman font
  • Running header in the upper left of all pages
  • Page number in the upper right of all pages Health economics and Gini index.
  • Parenthetical in-text citations included and formatted in APA style
  • References page (at the very least the textbook and/or online lessons should be cited)

 

Grading

This activity will be graded based on the Essay Grading Rubric.

 

Course Outcomes (CO): 3, 4, 5, 6

 

Week 4 Assignment Rubric

Week 4 Assignment Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEssay 1 Central Idea
20.0 pts

Essay is clear and cohesive. Main questions are answered thoroughly.

17.0 pts

Essay is basically cohesive and stays on topic. Central Idea is apparent and major questions are answered.

15.0 pts

Central idea is present, but is not maintained as central throughout. Main questions need more attention.

12.0 pts

Central idea is difficult to identify. No seeming organization or cohesion in structure of paper.

0.0 pts

No effort

20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEssay 1 Writing

Health economics and Gini index

5.0 pts

Throughout the whole work, the writing is free of major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Essay utilizes paraphrases and/or quotes effectively and includes in-text citations and a references page.

4.25 pts

Throughout most of the work, the writing is free of major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Essay utilizes paraphrases and/or quotes mostly effectively and includes in-text citations and a references page.

3.75 pts

Throughout some of the work, the writing is free of major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Essay utilizes paraphrases and/or quotes somewhat effectively and includes in-text citations and a references page.

3.0 pts

Throughout little of the work, the writing is free of major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Does not paraphrase or quote and cite the textbook or online lessons.

0.0 pts

No effort

5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEssay 2 Central Idea
20.0 pts

Essay is clear and cohesive. Main questions are answered thoroughly.

17.0 pts

Essay is basically cohesive and stays on topic. Central Idea is apparent and major questions are answered.

15.0 pts

Central idea is present, but is not maintained as central throughout. Main questions need more attention.

12.0 pts

Central idea is difficult to identify. No seeming organization or cohesion in structure of paper.

0.0 pts

No effort

20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEssay 2 Writing
5.0 pts

Throughout the whole work, the writing is free of major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Essay utilizes paraphrases and/or quotes effectively and includes in-text citations and a references page.

4.25 pts

Throughout most of the work, the writing is free of major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Essay utilizes paraphrases and/or quotes mostly effectively and includes in-text citations and a references page.

3.75 pts

Throughout some of the work, the writing is free of major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Essay utilizes paraphrases and/or quotes somewhat effectively and includes in-text citations and a references page.

3.0 pts

Throughout little of the work, the writing is free of major errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Does not paraphrase or quote and cite the textbook or online lessons.

0.0 pts

No effort

5.0 pts
Total Points: 50.0 Health economics and Gini index

 

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top